These are some excerpts from a New York Times article :
"While Mr. Kerry's longtime friends from Boston privately express frustration that they have been unable to get Mr. Kerry to stand up for himself more, one senior Kerry aide said obliquely that the campaign still planned to address the attacks on Mr. Kerry in a dramatic way.
You have not heard the last from us on this subject," the aide said. Responding to Mr. Bush's suggestion that Mr. Kerry would have left Mr. Hussein in place, a Kerry spokesman, Phil Singer, said the president had "absolutely crossed the line."
Wow! These words sound like something out of a mafia movie. The democrats are so desperate, they are starting to scare me.
You can read the rest of the story here
According to another article, the Abu Ghraib stories was supposed to help Kerry, but it did not.
"In April, Democratic activists were agonizing over what they saw as Kerry’s failure to clearly tell voters why they should elect him. Then in late May, in the wake of Abu Ghraib prison abuse furor, Democrats pressed their attack on Bush and seemed confident Kerry would win.
But Kerry was unable to capitalize on the momentum generated by Abu Ghraib. Perhaps it was due to lack of focus on the issue of Bush’s competence to conduct the war in Iraq and the war on terrorists. Kerry’s own unforced errors — such as saying he would have voted for using force against Iraq even if he knew there were no weapons of mass destruction there — almost certainly have played a role in his sagging poll numbers."
I thought Abu Graib was about getting the truth out there? I guess not!
You can read the rest of this story here
Since all of these have failed, they have decided to attack in a more "dramatic way" what ever that means I hope it goes the way of the others.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home